Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Criminal facts

The facts charged were revised to the extent that it does not infringe on the defendant's substantial right of defense.

1. From around 14:50 on September 30, 2016 to 15:20 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s coffee business by allowing the victim E, who was the captain of the case, to receive compensation from the victim “D” coffee located in Busan Saro-gu, the Defendant: (a) to ask the victim for compensation from d”; (b) to give the victim a voice; and (c) to avoid disturbance; (d) to make the customers who facen in coffee within the coffee; and (e) to let the customers who facen in coffee; and (e) allowing them to leave the coffee; and (e) allowing them to enter the coffee; and (e) preventing them from entering the coffee; and (e) interfering with the victim’s coffee sales.

2. The Defendant: (a) the victim slope G of the police officer, who was dispatched after receiving a report at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, did not cover the Defendant’s trial expenses; (b) the explanation; and (c) the description of the defect and the quality of the Gap-sab; and (d) the Defendant “if the Defendant is a police officer, the Defendant shall cherb, if the Defendant is the police officer, and if the flab of this char

Maz, as Maz, Maz, Mazk Mazk, and other sound, and desireed to take a bath, and the victim openly insultd the victim about 10 minutes, such as intending to throw the cryp of coffee in the table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes bound in the investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;