Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 22, 2017, around 00:27, the Defendant forced indecent act committed an indecent act by committing an indecent act in the following manner: (a) following the Victim F (the 19 years old) who dances in the E clubs located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, while playing in the future; (b) the Defendant continued to find out the victim who left the damaged area; (c) the victim who left the damaged area; (d) the Defendant’s body was pushed down; and (e) the victim’s body was re-explodeded; and (e) coerciond the victim by re-confluening the victim’s sium.

2. The Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim at the time, time, and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (1) above, and assaulted the victim, such as flicking, flicking, flicking, etc., by the victim’s flickness.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A report on investigation (Attachment of images of a victim);

1. An investigation report (verification of on-site CCTV images);

1. Application of the statutes on field CCTV storage CDs;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order was determined by the Defendant and the defense counsel. Although the Defendant and the defense counsel had danced by the Defendant at a club once on the victim’s shoulder and lusium for the purpose of dancing and right to dance, there was no fact that the victim’s lusium was limited twice, and there was no intention to commit an indecent act against the victim.

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, at the time, the victim was exposed to the young female at the age of 19, who was Cheongba and Doba, from the bones of Cheongba, to the Cheongba, and was exposed to the Cheongba, and the defendant was exposed to the victim without any awareness.