Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,752,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 29, 2014 to November 19, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff’s status as the party to the lawsuit is Plaintiff Yando Fisheries Cooperatives established pursuant to the Fisheries Cooperatives Act (hereinafter “Plaintiff Suhyup Cooperatives”). Defendant A is the district fisheries cooperatives established pursuant to the Fisheries Cooperatives Act, and Defendant A served as Plaintiff Y’s employee from August 25, 198 to May 16, 2006.
(A) Evidence No. 9). (b)
(1) The Plaintiff Suwon Bank established a mortgage on the land and buildings owned by it from January 20, 2006 to May 12, 2006 and extended loans to them as indicated in the following table (hereinafter “each of the instant loans”).
The Defendant carried out the business of each of the above loans as the head of the Plaintiff’s water consultation D branch (Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 2-2, 4-1, 5-2) [However, the Defendant was issued by the head of the headquarters E at the Plaintiff’s water consultation D branch on May 8, 2006, but approved the instant loans No. 2 and 3 as a person with full power to move to a new workplace, despite being issued by the head of the headquarters E at the Plaintiff water consultation D branch on May 8, 2006.
(A) The loan amount of No. 6-1 and No. 7-1 of the No. 7-1 of the No. 5 of the title of the secured real estate loan (a secured real estate title) between the debtor and the debtor's secured real estate loan amounted to KRW 170,000,000 on Jan. 20, 206 and KRW 189.7 square meters on the land of this case (the real estate of this case No. 1) and the loan of this case No. 1 of this case on May 12, 2006 (the real estate of this case No. 1), the loan amount of KRW 71,00,000,000 on May 164, 2006 and KRW 204.1 square meters on the land of this case (the real estate of this case No. 2) 33,200,000 on May 16, 2006, the land of this case No. 3274 square meters on the land of this case
(1) On January 31, 2006, the Seoul Southern-gu Imbro 583.4m2 (hereinafter “Im2 before division”) shall be the “Im2”).
2) On January 31, 2006, after the instant loan No. 1 was executed, the Plaintiff Suwon Bank established a collateral security on the instant real estate No. 1 (No. 2).
Plaintiff
The Plaintiff Suhyup Bank, which has suffered losses, did not fully repay the loan to the obligor.