logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.08.09 2017고정144
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a BD car.

On December 18, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle above 06:00 on December 18, 2016, and got the front of D in C to the direction from the right police station to the right-way of about 50km in speed.

At this point, since the passage of a vehicle is frequent through a private-distance intersection, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of a traffic accident in advance by accurately manipulating the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to properly handle hand, and took part of the part of the victim E-driving in front of the left side of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the above vehicle in front of the driver's knife, which was the traffic signal at the intersection in the direction opposite to the traffic in the right direction as it is, and continued to proceed to the right side, while parking in three-lanes, received the front part of the part of the victim G, which was left behind the left side of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the above HW car’s repair cost to the extent that the repair cost is equivalent to KRW 3,178,778, and the repair cost is equivalent to KRW 1,755,931, respectively.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages is a holder of BRa car.

Although the defendant is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance on the road, he operated the motor vehicle without mandatory insurance at the temporary location specified in paragraph 1 above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. G statements;

1. The next inquiry (B);

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the scene of traffic accidents;

arrow