1. The defendant's notary public against the plaintiffs shall have the execution power of No. 1423, 2001, No. 1423, which was signed by the joint law office.

1. The Plaintiffs asserts that “The portion of the obligation exceeding KRW 12 million under the executive title stated in paragraph (1) is prepared and void by the Defendant’s unauthorized act, and the obligation of KRW 12 million was fully repaid.”

The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, so the above assertion is without merit.

2. According to the evidence No. 1 of the judgment as to the conjunctive assertion, since the fact that the ten-year extinctive prescription period from April 30, 201, which was the date of repayment under the executive title stated in the Disposition No. 1, had elapsed, is apparent, the Defendant’s claim terminated.

The above argument is with merit.

3. The decision is delivered with the assent of all participating Justices who accepted the plaintiffs' claim.