logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.14 2017나79587
전부금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) L’s construction contract-related L’s title (former name: E), one’s own wife, purchased land of H and M 2 in the Asia-si around June 201, 201, and only “D” with respect to acts conducted under L’s name (hereinafter “D”).

) On August 1, 2011, Sejong General Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ Sejong General Construction”)

A) Between the above land and the International Telecom (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”)

A) The construction contract was concluded to newly construct the construction cost of KRW 1.25 billion (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

2) On August 26, 2011, F Co., Ltd. F (formerly before the change: Limited Company G; hereinafter “F”) drafted a contract agreement stating that the instant construction work will be contracted for KRW 1.2 billion for construction cost, in the sense that it is jointly and severally and severally liable for payment of construction cost under D’s instant construction work, as a joint contractor for the instant construction project.

3) On February 21, 2012, Sejong Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “PP”) prepares and delivers to F a letter of waiver of the instant construction project, including the intent to waive the instant construction project due to financial problems, etc., and on the other hand, on February 22, 2012, the Sejong Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “PP Development”).

(4) On February 22, 2012, 201, in the case of Asan City, the construction participant report was made to change the contractor of the instant construction from the Sejong Integrated Construction to the Sejong Integrated Construction Act to the "J for the development of Sejong Industries", and on February 22, 2012, the F prepared and issued a written consent to consent to change the name of the owner of the instant construction to the J. Accordingly, in the case of Asan City, the construction participant report was made to change the owner of the instant construction from the "B" to the "J".

5) Meanwhile, the development of the Sejong Industrial Complex around that time between J and J on February 10, 2012, set forth the contractor and the contract price of KRW 1,030,000,000 (value-added tax set forth separately as value-added tax).

arrow