logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.05.26 2016고단740
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 24, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 to a fine for a violation of road traffic laws at the Jung-gu District Court on the part of October 24, 2008, and on November 5, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 from the Seoul Eastern District Court to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 for a violation of road traffic laws

[2] On March 1, 2016, at around 01:59, the Defendant driven a balcon vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 500 meters from the 3rd parking lot of the Seoul Gwangjin-gu, Seoul to the 73-12nd road of the same ridge-ro 7-33-12.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of written inquiries about criminal history and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment is that the defendant has been punished twice due to drinking, but a considerable time has passed since the punishment was finally imposed, there is no previous conviction, the driving volume of the defendant is high, and the defendant's depth reflects the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age and sexual behavior, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age and sexual behavior.

arrow