logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.06.26 2015고단357
공공단체등위탁선거에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 900,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 11, 2015, the Defendant came out on February 5, 2015 to become a candidate for the president of the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation at the first time.

The Defendant was willing to go to the head of the B Agricultural Cooperative Association and was willing to carry out an election campaign by sending the name of the Defendant to the members of the B Agricultural Cooperative by sending a compromise to them.

On January 2, 2015, the Defendant, at Echeon-si, Leecheon-si, 456, the election campaign period, sent to 909 members of the Agricultural Cooperative (1,530 electors) of the Agricultural Cooperative (1,530 electors) “I wish to conduct an audit after the late year, and I want to see the pleasure and happiness in the future of the late year during which I want to obtain the pleasure and happiness in the future.” “2005” as written in the written indictment on January 2, 2015 appears to be the clerical error of “2015.” 1. CFF (the former DF branch office).

Accordingly, the defendant carried out an election campaign before the election campaign period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Smokes and bags;

1. List of members of the Agricultural Cooperatives;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (Attachment to Address Level);

1. Article 66 of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts, and Articles 66 subparagraph 1 and 24 (2) of the Act on Entrusted Elections by Public Organizations, etc. Selection of Punishment, etc. (where it is not an election campaign period, referring to an election campaign) and selection

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is the defendant's time of and reflects on his own crime, and the defendant does not leave the above election upon the commencement of the investigation into this case, and the defendant's above act is highly likely to impair the transparency and fairness of the election of the chief of the association who is relatively small number of voters, and the defendant does not ask the competent election commission regardless of repeated educational and promotional books.

arrow