logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단3972
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 28, 2008, the Defendant is either a fine of one million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Changwon District Court on April 28, 2008, and a fine of 1.5 million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the same court on July 19, 201.

On October 16, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.068% during blood transfusions, driven DN-si car at approximately 300 meters in the section of 300 meters in front of Kimhae-si Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, for approximately 334 meters in front of the fact that the Defendant driven DN-si car at approximately 300 meters in front of the Jinyoung-si Hospital, Kimhae-si.

As a result, the Defendant was punished more than twice for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) but was under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on detection of drivers in violation of traffic Acts on roads;

1. Statement report and investigation report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business (report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business);

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of two copies of a reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (finite filing of summary orders), and summary orders;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 148-2(1)1 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (a) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment (a fine shall be chosen by taking into account the following: (b) the confession of the defendant, the defendant himself/herself is divided in depth with his/her mistake; and (c) the disposition of the vehicle operated by him/her does not repeat again in the future while disposing of it; (d) the amount of alcohol concentration in the blood of the defendant was not high at the time of the crime of this case; (e) there was no traffic accident; and (e) there was no previous criminal record for which seven years or more have passed before the judgment; and (e) the defendant has no previous criminal record subject to punishment due

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow