Defendant

A Imprisonment of two years and six months, and Defendant B, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Even if the Defendants were not the narcotics handler, they dealt with the Meart clocks (one philophone; hereinafter “philophones”) as follows.

1. Purchasing Defendant A’s phiphones;

A. On October 22, 2015, the Defendant purchased philophones by taking approximately KRW 1g of 1 philophones from a person in a false name, who was introduced through the I located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Bank, to a fluoral account, and remitting KRW 400,000 to a fluoral account.

B. On November 5, 2015, in the vicinity of the J Station located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant purchased phiphones by purchasing KRW 300,000,000, when the Defendant took the philophones from the nameless person who was introduced by the said I and paid 300,000.

2. Mephone medication by the Defendants

A. On October 22, 2015, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones by making a smoke generated by heating 1g of philophones on the gambling place at the mutual influoric telephones located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City around October 22, 2015, using the inhaled tool made by Defendant B’s rapid use of plastics transit.

B. On November 5, 2015, at the Defendant’s residence located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K 101, the Defendants conspired with each other to administer phiphones by raising the volume of philophones into the string place, and raising the smoke arising from heating the strings with the strings made by Defendant B, using the strings made by Defendant B.

3. Defendant A’s Handphones sent to I residing in China on October 2015, through the “L” of smartphone hosting cam to Defendant A.

In this paper, I asked to change.

Accordingly, around November 11, 2015, I written the facts charged about 7.95 g in the aggregate of oponphones in China, but considering the facts charged about 8.04 g, the defendant A was closely imported in light of the report on detection and seizure of mert 7.95 g, China's international peculiar cargo that was lawfully adopted and investigated by this court.