logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.03.15 2017고단1126
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for larceny in the support of the Sugwon of Sugwon, and on May 24, 2017, the above judgment became final and conclusive on May 24, 2017.

1. On March 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported on around 20:0 on March 20, 2017, that the victim, who had drinking together at the victim D’s house, was under the influence of alcohol; (b) committed theft with one resident registration certificate located adjacent to the victim; (c) one motor vehicle driver’s license; (d) one copy of the new bank cke card; and (e) KRW 30,000,000,000,000 in Samsung galtho-T 4 smartphone, and cash located adjacent to the new bank; and (e) theft with one copy of the victim’s trademark registration certificate located adjacent to the victim.

2. On March 9, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business: (a) settled KRW 6,500,00 in taxi expenses on the front of the home plug, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Ansan-si, which was located in Ansan-si, and (b) paid KRW 38,40,00 on three occasions from that time until March 9, 2017, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

3. On March 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the Defendant as if he was the genuine holder with the stolen physical card on the front of the home fluor, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si; (b) paid taxi expenses equivalent to KRW 6,500; and (c) by deceiving him on three occasions from March 9, 2017 by the same method until March 20:45, 2017; and (d) obtained property or pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 38,400,00 in total by deceiving him on three occasions, as stated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A detailed statement of use of the check card;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history, reporting on investigation (report on confirmation of cases pending in trial) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to attached judgment;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act in relation to a crime, Article 70 (1) 3 of the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Credit (the use of stolen credit cards) of the Act, Article 347 (1) of each Criminal Act, and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, respectively.

arrow