beta
Text
1. The Defendants: (a) KRW 5,000,000 for each Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum from February 27, 2013 to January 22, 2014; and (c)
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a person running the Taekwondo hall in the name of “F” (hereinafter referred to as the “F”) in Young-gu, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu. The Defendants operate the Taekwondo hall in the name of “G”, “H” and “I” in the neighboring areas.
B. On January 2013, the Plaintiff opened the Taekwondo ground in the vicinity of the Taekwondo ground operated by the Defendants and opened the instant Taekwondo ground. The Defendants conspired to prepare and distribute to the Plaintiff the appeal stating the contents that are not good to the Plaintiff in order to check the operation of the Taekwondo ground. On February 20, 2013, the Plaintiff: “The Taekwondo ground of this case is a non-member of the Taekwondo Association of Cheongju; the Taekwondo ground of this case returned to the Cheongju-dong, Yongdong, Kadong, Gindong, Daejeon, and the Cheongju-gun; and then, the Plaintiff opened the Taekwondo ground of “The appeal of this case” (hereinafter referred to as the “the appeal of this case”) stating that “The Defendants distributed to the Cheongwon and the Cheongju-dong to the Cheongju-dong, the Cheongdong, the Kadong, Daejeon, and the Maju-gun, who operated the seal in the area of the Taekwondo ground of this case, sold the high seal premium and sold it to the Plaintiff.
C. The Defendants were indicted as impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly pointing out facts as to the facts in which the instant appeal was drawn up and distributed. On June 12, 2013, the Defendants received a summary order of KRW 3 million from the Cheongju District Court (Cheongju District Court 2013 High Court 2013 High Court 4133), which became final and conclusive.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) ① The Defendants distributed not less than 30 copies of the instant lake and marsh, but not more than 300 copies, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation, and ② Defendant D’s meeting on March 17, 2013.