1. Defendant B’s KRW 30 million and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from May 21, 2004 to November 6, 2012.

The parties to the case of recognition of the partial liability for damages against Defendant B is the person who was detained due to the crime of murder committed by the F and G (hereinafter “relevant dead”) due to the liquidation poisoning of the F and G (hereinafter “relevant dead”) caused by Goyang-si E apartment 565 dong on February 20, 2002 (hereinafter “relevant murder case”). The Plaintiff was finally and conclusively acquitted (hereinafter “relevant murder case”).

Defendant B is a person indicted as the Plaintiff and his accomplice in the murder related murder case, and Defendant C and D are investigators who have been in charge of the relevant murder case at the Goyang Police Station.

Defendant B and D, an investigator in charge of the investigation into the relevant murder case, made a statement to the effect that “the Plaintiff was addicted to the death of the Plaintiff, and she became able to commit the murder by being used by the Plaintiff” during the course of investigation into the relevant murder case. The testimony was also made in the case of the case, i.e., the first instance court of the relevant murder-related murder-related case, 200 high-level 141, 143 (Joint) and 204 high-level 43 (Joint).

In the first instance of the murder case, the above court held that there was a serious conflict between the plaintiff and H, the father of the relevant deceased, and that the plaintiff may be the motive and circumstance of the plaintiff's murder, despite the plaintiff's divorce and marriage with himself. However, the plaintiff prepared to commit the crime by leading the defendant B and that the plaintiff and the defendant Eul were in the scene of the crime of this case, and that the plaintiff and the plaintiff were in the scene of the crime of this case, and that there was no evidence of the plaintiff's intrusion upon the deceased's house, the court rendered a judgment of not guilty against the plaintiff on the ground that the evidence submitted was insufficient to believe and insufficient, and that the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2004No1406) and the Supreme Court (2005Do7910) rendered a judgment of not guilty against the plaintiff.