A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From January 28, 2007, the Defendant is a person engaged in food sales business under the trade name of “E” in the D market located in Daegu Northern-gu C from January 28, 2007.

No one shall sell, collect, manufacture, import, process, use, cook, store, subdivide, transport or display foods, etc. which are likely to cause harm to human health, as they are stale, stale or unripe foods for sale.

Nevertheless, the defendant from June 2013 to the same year.

9. By December 25, 200, 55 distribution companies located in Daegu-gu, such as I in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and 55 distribution companies located in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, in the middle-gu, Daegu-gu, in the shape of a string of a brush, part of the brue fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Each legal statement of witness K and L;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the examination protocol of suspect;

1. Statement of police statement to M and K;

1. Nicipact;

1. Views and photographs by capturing a dynamic image;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (a multi-fluence photograph and a professor’s opinion at O university);

1. Article 94 (1) 1 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 4 subparagraph 1 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Articles 10(1) and 8(1) of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment

1. The Defendant asserts that since the strush portion of the rush portion of the rush portion produced and sold by the Defendant was not likely to harm health, the above rush portion is not food.

The circumstances recognized by the above evidence, i.e., the collection of a variety of horses sold by the defendant, and e.g., mathy.