logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.07 2014가단210171
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 1,073,300 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its payment from April 15, 2014 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that engages in wholesale and retail business of clothes, bags, shoess, and other miscellaneous articles. Defendant A is a person who worked in the Plaintiff Company from November 11, 2013 to April 15, 2014, and Defendant B is a fidelity guarantor of Defendant A.

B. At around October 2013, Defendant A and C were running the business of importing and selling 6,763 the age-based golf products in Thailand through the Dispute Resolution D, but they became difficult due to lack of funds. Accordingly, C solicited the Plaintiff to make an investment in the said business, and the Plaintiff anticipated and consented to bring a considerable profit. In that process, C recommended the Plaintiff to be an employee in charge of importing and selling the said golf products. Accordingly, around November 11, 2013, Defendant A joined the Plaintiff Company. around November 12, 2013, Defendant A received 6,763 the above age-based golf products and began to sell them to the Plaintiff’s warehouse, but Defendant A’s mother, who was the Plaintiff, was jointly and severally liable for the Plaintiff’s intentional or negligent loss to the Plaintiff.

C. On December 4, 2013, Defendant A again proposed that the Plaintiff sell 121,431,232, a total of 4,360 golf products in Thailand, and the Plaintiff approved it. However, on January 17, 2014, the Plaintiff confirmed that all of the products originally intended to purchase were sold, and revised the plan to import 5,061 other age golf products. 2) The Plaintiff requested the LABD to operate the said LAD, and the LABD also decided to purchase the products from LABD through LAW marketing.

3. Accordingly.

arrow