Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for two years, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.
However, Defendant C and D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On May 3, 2013, Defendant C was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Busan District Court on May 3, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 11, 201
【Criminal Facts】
The Defendants sold non-listed stocks, which are financial investment instruments, to many and unspecified persons, and came to know in the N’s “N” which pays allowances when attracting investors.
Defendant
On February 20, 2012, A established a foreign exchange futures trading company P(P) of Busan Shipping DaeguO and 1903, the representative director of the P P(P). Defendant B took charge of the management of investments and employees, and attracting investors. Defendant C was in charge of the job of management support team leader to recruit students in foreign exchange futures trading. Defendant C was in the position of the Director of the SP Center, and was in charge of the job of the job of the director of the SP Center, and was in charge of the job of attracting investors by receiving 10% of the investment amount as commission, and Defendant D was in charge of the job of attracting investors.
Defendant
D around March 2012, 2012, the victim Q Q, who was known to the general public, "a good company that can make investments, will introduce C, which is carrying on a big business in Cheongdae, and will be engaged in a big business now." After hearing an explanation from the victim to the above office, she received a profit by investing KRW 200 million as retirement pay at Dong Asia University, and then receiving a benefit of KRW 600,000 per month. Thus, if the capital is invested in KRW 1 billion, it can be punished by KRW 30,000 per month, so it may be punished by 1 billion per month."
Defendant
A and the prosecutor prosecuted the victim that Defendant A had concealed the victim by stating that “A has a certificate of qualification by developing an automatic foreign exchange transaction system in the United States of America”, but the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is without any reasonable doubt that Defendant A said statement was made to the victim.