logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.20 2018나2048
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which the court should explain by this court, is evidence additionally examined by this court, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of witness E’s testimony which is insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion that “the period of extinctive prescription has ceased, since the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to find the Defendant’s wife around July 2014, and the Defendant approved it,” thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow