logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.10.07 2014고단1121
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those engaged in driving a B Eth Motor Vehicle;

On June 29, 2014, at around 13:25, the Defendant driven the said car with a alcohol content of 0.160% 0.160%, and driven the road in front of the “trade school affairs” located in the Daegu Western-gu, Seogu, Daegu Medical Center, along one lane from the distance of death.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

The Defendant, while neglecting his/her duty to use the breath signal at the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant, neglected to do so and caused the victim to go beyond the floor by taking part on the right side of the victim C(37 years old) driving on the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant in front of the vehicle of the Defendant due to the negligence in violation of the new subparagraph, even though he/she had a red signal.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s injury in the course of performing the above occupational negligence for about four weeks of closing down the bones of fingers that require medical treatment, and at the same time, even though the victim’s damage to repair expenses equivalent to KRW 1,095,00, such as the damage of the side part of the victim’s ozones, he immediately stopped and stopped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim, and continued to drive the above vehicle at a 176-meter rate without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim, and the Defendant was deprived from another driver, etc. who observed the accident, and was arrested to the police who was called into the victim’s report without stopping any longer.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) shall be deemed to have violated the Road Traffic Act, such as paragraph (1).

arrow