The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On October 27, 2017, the Defendant received a written notice of enlistment in active duty service under the name of the director of the regional military manpower office in Chungcheongnam-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seowon-si, that “Until December 12, 2017, 14:00, the Defendant did not enlist without justifiable grounds by the date three days after the date of enlistment.”

2. Determination

A. The record reveals the following circumstances.

① From the time when the Defendant got out of C religious organization’s believers and his parents’ influence, the Defendant was present at the assembly of C religious organization, was given sexual intercourses and received education accordingly. On December 26, 2010, the Defendant was c religious organization’s believers upon receiving an invasion.

The defendant's three villages, matriarches, and private villages are the trust of C religious organizations.

2. The defendant is present at a meeting twice a week by belonging to D, E, F, G, etc. after he was invaded, and participates in radio wave activities for at least four days a week, and is engaged in regular strike activities for at least four days a week, and is present at the competitions each year.

③ The believers of C religious organizations did not participate in wars for a long time according to their belief, and refused to participate in military training, military training, and arms, and thereafter, refused military service on the ground of religious conscience until many believers were sentenced to punishment.

④ Upon receipt of the enlistment notice in active duty service, the Defendant submitted to the Military Manpower Administration a written notification that he refuses military service based on conscience, along with a written confirmation of the fact that he belongs to C religious organization F.

Since the investigation agency, the Defendant has maintained the intent to refuse military service on the grounds of religious belief while accepting the risk of criminal punishment.

(5) There is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and that he/she has committed violent acts or inclinations contrary to his/her religious belief in the course of growth.

(6) The defendant shall be a private alternative service system irrelevant to the military.