1. The Defendants shall jointly:

A. Plaintiff A: KRW 38,821,519, respectively, and each of its money to Plaintiff B, C, and D.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties A is the wife of G deceased, and Plaintiff B, C, and D are children of G.

Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”) is a company that runs a waste disposal business, and Defendant E is a person who works as a driver of sclick in Defendant F.

Plaintiff

A’s succeeding Intervenor (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor”) is a legal entity that paid the Plaintiff’s survivor pension to the Plaintiff following the death of G.

B. G around 09:30 on May 6, 2016, G sought to cut trees planted in the air space owned by Defendant F, Defendant F, located in Pocheon-si, Ma. However, G extended over the sn beam ( approximately 3 meters in length) of the trees he wanted to be cut, G considered Defendant E as having received the sn beam h beam from the near Defendant E, and Defendant E driven the sn beam and opened it over the sn beam sn beam on the sn beam top of the sn beam beam. Upon completion of G’s cutting of trees with an electric snick, Defendant E tried to leave the h beam beam on the ground, but Defendant E was deprived of the sn beam centered weight, lost the sn beamline on the sn beam, and fell into the ground, and Defendant E became the sn beam of G sn beam (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Defendant E, upon request from the neighbors, reported to 119, and thereafter 119 first-aid patients sent G to the “J Hospital” located in Pocheon-si I, but died due to the reason such as multi-school growth contribution, etc. around 10:37. (2) The Plaintiffs jointly succeeded to G upon the death of G.

3) The Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor paid KRW 2,001,380,00 to Plaintiff A due to the instant accident from June 2016 to September 2017. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor paid KRW 2,01,380,00 to Plaintiff A as a result of the instant accident. [Grounds for recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 10, and evidence Nos. 1 through 7

2. Determination:

A. According to the facts acknowledged prior to Defendant E’s liability for damages under Article 750 of the Civil Act, Defendant E is in the vicinity of Pound.