logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.10.30 2020고단2115
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bchip car.

On February 19, 2020, the Defendant driven the above car on February 12:37, 2020, and proceeded bypassing the Do government from the direction of the playground distance to the direction of the Do government.

At all times, the signal apparatus has been installed in the front, so in this case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in driving service and to drive safely in accordance with the protection of the front bank.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop in front of the above crosswalk while the vehicle signal of the intersection is red and the pedestrian walking adjacent to the intersection is green, but by failing to stop in front of the above crosswalk and by failing to make a direction to the right side from the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, the victim C (In this case, the 29-year-old driver’s right side on the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle was turned to the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as diversous salt, tension, etc., for about two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on a traffic accident;

1. C’s written statement-related vehicle photographs, signal cycle report, each investigation report, black-book video CD diagnosis (the Defendant does not violate the signal even if a vehicle signal at the intersection is bypass in the red. Even if the signal signal at the intersection was violated, the Defendant’s right-hand side of the intersection at the time was used by the right-hand side under the recognition that the flow of the vehicle traveling on the right-hand side from the intersection at the time when the signal signal was obstructed, and thus, the Defendant’s violation of the signal signal (the occurrence of the negligence and damage) is argued to the effect that there is no causation between the negligence and the damage, but the vehicle signal at the intersection is red and the pedestrian at the crosswalk is green.

arrow