1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a long-term lease contract with the New Capital Capital Co., Ltd. and B (hereinafter “instant one vehicle”) and used the said vehicle, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with C (hereinafter “instant two vehicles”).

B. On October 29, 2016, D: (i) around 04:15, October 29, 2016, E Two-wheeled Motor Vehicle (hereinafter “instant Oba”)

2) While driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle into the front-do road from the Jinbuk-dong bank to the front-do bank, due to the negligence in violation of the signal without a motorcycle driver’s license, which led to the intersection located in 224, Jeoncheon-dong, Jeonju-si, Jeoncheon-dong, Jeoncheon-do, and caused the front part of the two vehicles of this case to the left-hand side of the Oran-do bank, where the above intersection is straighted from the upper-hand bank located in the 4-distance bank from the upper-hand side of the water bank in accordance with the new code, the front part of the two vehicles of this case was shocked on the left

). 2) 위 F은 이 사건 1차 사고 직후 핸들을 좌측으로 조작하여 이 사건 2차량의 진행 맞은편에서 예수병원 방면에서 관통4거리 방면으로 진행하던 중 이 사건 교차로에 이르러 신호를 받기 위해 정차 중인 이 사건 1차량의 우측 앞 범퍼 및 휀다 부분을 이 사건 2차량 우측면 부분으로 충격하고, 다시 다가교 교각을 충격하였다가 그 충격으로 튕기면서 이 사건 1차량 우측 옆면을 이 사건 2차량으로 재차 충격하였다

(hereinafter “instant secondary accident”). C.

In the instant second accident, the Plaintiff spent KRW 6,600,000 in total from November 22, 2016 to April 21, 2017 on the repair cost of the instant one vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The parties’ assertion.