The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (two years of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for an ex officio appeal, the prosecutor examined the case ex officio, and the prosecutor requested to change the name of the crime of this case to "special injury" from "violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.)" and "Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act" in "Article 258-2 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act" in "Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act. Since this court permitted this and changed to the subject of the judgment, the judgment of the court below is no longer maintained.

3. Thus, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's unfair argument about sentencing, and the judgment below is ruled as follows through pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the evidence admitted by the court are the same as the corresponding columns of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. 범죄사실에 대한 해당 법조 형법 제 258조의 2 제 1 항, 제 257조 제 1 항 양형의 이유 이 사건 범행은 피고인이 위험한 물건인 맥주병으로 피해자의 얼굴을 때려 피해자에게 8 주간의 치료가 필요한 우 안 망막 출혈 등의 상해를 가한 것으로 범행방법 및 죄질이 상당히 나쁜 점, 이 사건 범행으로 인하여 피해자는 병원에서 우 안( 右眼) 유리체 수술, 수정체 초음파 유 화술, 인공 수정체 삽입술 등을 시행 받았으나, 망막 위축으로 인한 시력 저하가 여전히 남아 있고, 향후 시력이 호전될 가능성이 거의 없는 점, 피해자의 상해 정도가 중함에도 피고인은 당 심에 이르기까지 피해자와 합의하지 못하여,...