Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed.
B. The Defendant’s February 2014.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On August 23, 2010, the Plaintiff, as noncommissioned Officer, was discharged on September 24, 2010, from the military force education headquarters, as a result of brush pains during training.
B. On July 17, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State on the basis of the deceased’s wound (hereinafter “the instant wound”). However, on February 7, 2014 on the grounds of the following review results of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant issued a notice of non-determination of the person who has rendered distinguished service to the State and the person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
On September 16, 2010, the H5-S1, which was confirmed by the opinion of September 16, 2010, confirmed that the diagnosis records of other related data were not confirmed. The results of individual medical advice on the CD video data on January 10, 2014, in terms of the individual medical advice on the CD image data, they are the opinion of flive expansion of a sexuality, and the vertebrate L5 and vertebrate L5/S1 were confirmed to have been realized immediately after entering the military without any credit related to military duties, and it is difficult to recognize the relevance of official duties without any credit. In addition to the Plaintiff’s statement, it was confirmed that there was an individual medical advisory opinion on medical advice that it is difficult to recognize the relevance of official
There is no specific and objective record which is deemed to have deteriorated beyond the natural progress speed.
On November 22, 2013, the Air Force Chief of Staff prepared a written confirmation of facts related to the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the Plaintiff, stating that “The Plaintiff, after entering the National Armed Forces, was diagnosed as having been diagnosed as having been on the ebrates and tensions of lebrates as a result of medical treatment at the port unit of the Air Force Education Headquarters on September 6, 2010, and was diagnosed as having been on September 14, 2010 after being diagnosed as having been on the vertebrates as a result of medical treatment at the National Armed Forces Hospital on September 24, 2010.”
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1-5 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.