logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.06.01 2017고단1640
협박
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is between the Defendant and the victim B (the age of 47) who was divorced.

around 02:40 on 01. 03. 01. 01. 02:0, the Defendant found the victim’s residence, and changed to open the door to the victim. However, the Defendant opened the door “to open the door by hanging the door so that the victim does not open the door.”

Manman is not to leave.

Nant may die and thrown away.

I look at the avoidance.

“A threat was made to a victim for about 30 minutes, such as committing loud noise.”

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. Not requiring the punishment of the victim: On May 22, 2017, after the institution of the instant indictment, submission of a letter of withdrawal of a complaint and a written application for carbon containing a statement of intent not to punish the victim.

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow