logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.02.17 2015가합103875
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver each real estate listed in Appendix 1’s Schedule;

(b) annex 2 obstacles.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The general industrial complex development project is implemented and the Plaintiff’s ownership is acquired; 1) The Kimpo market and the Kimpo-Tech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Yimpo-Tech Co., Ltd.”).

) The Kimpo-si General Industrial Complex Development Project [The Gimpo A General Industrial Complex](B)(hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”).

The project operator approved an industrial complex plan pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Simplification of Authorization Procedures for Industrial Complexes to jointly implement the project [the project in this case was publicly notified as the Gyeonggi-do Notice No. 2013-92 ( April 8, 2013), Gyeonggi-do Notice No. 2013-258 ( September 10, 2013), Gyeonggi-do Notice No. 2014-156 ( June 5, 2014), Gyeonggi-do Notice No. 2014-205 ( July 17, 2014).

(2) On March 11, 2015, in accordance with relevant statutes, such as the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor, the Kim Madrum acquired each of the instant real estate through consultation from C who owned each of the instant real estate listed in the list of real estate listed in [Attachment 1] on March 11, 2015, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 2, 2015. On the same day, the Plaintiff entrusted each of the instant real estate in trust to the Plaintiff, and completed each of the instant registration of ownership transfer in the Plaintiff’s name.

B. The Defendant shall be liable for damages against the Defendant of the Kim Madle Ballast; 1) The Defendant shall be liable for damages on each of the obstacles listed in the separate sheet No. 2 obstacles existing in each of the instant real property (hereinafter “each obstacles of this case”).

2) The Gyeonggi-do and the Local Land Tribunal applied for a ruling on August 31, 2015, as it did not reach an agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant on the acquisition of each obstacles of this case, while owning building materials, etc.

arrow