logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.09.12 2012고정2720
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 19, 2010, at around 23:30 on May 19, 2010, the Defendant, while drunkd the victim D (here, 68 years of age) under the influence of alcohol at the Defendant’s house located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and attempted to get the victim’s bridge, etc. up to the rooftop stairs to avoid this, without any reason.

Accordingly, the defendant was faced with the shoulder of the victim by leaving the victim, etc., and the victim was faced with the shoulder of the victim, thereby making up for about seven weeks of treatment to the left-hand elel of the victim.

2. Around 03:00 on February 26, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, knife knife knife, knife knife knife, knife knife knife, knife knife kn

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for conviction and sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment order, although the victim's complaint of this case appears to have been primarily related to a divorce lawsuit pending between the defendant and the victim rather than seeking punishment against the defendant, it appears that the victim's statement is reliable in the victim's statement because it is consistent with the investigative agency from this court to this court, and otherwise, it does not seem that there are any other circumstances to dismiss credibility in the victim's statement.

arrow