beta
Text
1. The defendant shall display the attached drawings of D Underground E in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "C"), 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On April 29, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the operation of a specialized store (hereinafter “instant operating contract”) with the Defendant with respect to the above store after setting up a 45.8 square meters of the shop on the part of the (Ga) shop connected each point in sequence with D underground E in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, as indicated in the attached drawing No. 1, (2), (3, (4), and (1). The details of the contract are as follows.
(A) The plaintiff, Eul, and the defendant. (3) In the management of the sales of the POS sales system, the amount of 90% of the monthly estimated sales proposed in the business proposal must be determined as the "minimum monthly sales".
Article 26 (General Cost) (1) A shall pay 78% of monthly sales (including value-added tax) to B as a comprehensive comprehensive cost (including product cost, personnel expenses, direct expenses, and corporate profits).
Article 30 (Establishment of POS System) (7) B shall be sold after registration with the POS system except in extenuating circumstances, such as power failure, breakdown, etc. in selling goods.
Article 40 (Termination of Contract) (1) A shall terminate a contract after giving prior notice and peremptory notice in writing, if B fails to fulfill the terms and conditions of the contract as follows:
3. Where sales and registration through a separate POS terminal or similar terminal not approved to Gap, or cash receipt issued to Eul, which is not a franchise store of Gap, or credit card payment was made;
8. Where Article 30 (7) is violated three times within 12 months after the date of initial launch, such as entering or intentionally omitting the sales amount from the unuse or sales amount of the POS terminal, or intentionally returning and treating it, the case is subject to Article 43 (1) 16 and 17, and the case is subject to Article 43 (1) 16 and 17, and the case is subject to Article 43 (1) 16 and 17.