Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (a punishment of 18 years, confiscation, completion of a sexual assault therapy program with 120 hours, disclosure and notification of personal information between 10 years) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Examining the various religious conditions in the instant case, the lower court agreed to the Defendant to pay the amount of money embezzled by the Defendant to the victim F of embezzlement, the Defendant did not want the Defendant’s punishment, and the Defendant’s act of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape, etc.) was committed, and the Defendant’s act of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape, etc.) was committed. The victim’s refusal of the victim’s sexual intercourse, which led the Defendant to kill the victim somewhat contingently, and did not appear to have planned the crime. The Defendant’s embezzlement was not much high, and the Defendant’s contact as the victim E’s bereaved family member, and agreed to the Defendant’s bereaved family member, and the victim’s bereaved family member’s bereaved family member did not want the Defendant’s punishment. The Defendant’s act does not want the victim’s punishment, and the Defendant’s health member’s family member and young young children’s family member, and the Defendant’s health member’s young.

However, the crime of this case is committed in the course of assaulting the victim E on the ground that the victim E, who is a singing voice, is disregarding the defendant, and the victim who seeks to report to the police following the crime of this case and the victim who was in time, refused the demand of the defendant to commit rape, and attempted to commit rape.