Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:50 on May 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was in the street room located in Yasan-si B on the ground that the victim D (here, 48 years of age) who was aware of himself/herself and other males met; (b) was in the floor of his/her hand, and was in brain sins, dives, dives, and chrosiums requiring medical treatment for about 14 days by 2-3 times in the victim D’s scam for approximately 14 days; and (c) was in both hands due to the victim E (48 years of age) who returned to death like D and Si expenses, and was in both hands in the victim E-mail, the Defendant was in the hands of the victim E, and was in the hands of the victim E, and was in the son’s scam that requires medical treatment for about 14 days at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. A medical certificate (E), an injury medical certificate (D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [The defendant and his defense counsel claimed to the effect that "the defendant did not use violence as stated in the facts charged against the victims, and rather incurred serious injury, such as crypages, etc. unilaterally from the victim E." However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted by this court, i.e., the victims stated that they were subjected to violence from the defendant in comparison with the statements in the investigation agency: (i) each of the above testimony is consistent with and consistent with the main parts of the facts charged; (ii) the witness F, a substitute driver, also stated in this court that "the defendant and the victim E had expressed desire to do so by brying balms and smuggling with each other" (F).