beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 11, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Busan District Court on March 18, 2009, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Suwon House Housing Site on March 18, 2009, and on October 22, 2010, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on September 8, 2011.
At around 15:00 on August 19, 201, the Defendant appeared in the court of Seoul Northern District Court No. 202, which was located in Dobong-dong 626, Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the above court's violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act against C, 2011 and took an oath.
The defendant asked that D would have sought D's "I would like to find it to E", and asked D's answer to "I would like to give D one million won to the defendant in cash and received it to him," and continuously asked the counsel "I would like to answer D's answer to "I would like to "I would like to have borrowed two million won from D in terms of living expenses of the defendant" in the newspaper "I would like to say that "I would like to interfere with the conclusion of the case from the investigative agency, and there is no fact that C would have received three million won from D", and in fact that the complainant transferred two million won from D is transferred to the defendant's account, not to "I would like to be unrelated to this case".
However, in fact, C reported D to the prosecution as a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (marijuana) and thereafter, C introduced D the Defendant, who can perform public work, called "public work" to be considered in sentencing in the above case of reporting D, so the Defendant is aware of the fact that the Defendant demanded D to perform public work, and D performs the above public work at the above E level.