The judgment below

Among them, the part concerning obstruction of business, injury, and insult shall be reversed.

The defendant is punished by a fine.

1. The summary of grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) of the victim's statement is specific and consistent, and was at the scene of the appeal;

In light of the fact that the statement of K and J also conforms to the statements of the victim, it is recognized that the defendant obstructed the duties of the victim by failing to comply with the request for the withdrawal of the victim, and that the defendant injured the victim and insulting the victim.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. The summary of the facts charged is the defendant who is the chairperson of the clan C, and the victim D (E) has leased the factory building owned by the above clan.

A. On July 3, 2015, the Defendant refused to leave and interfere with business affairs, around 09:00, the Defendant partially revised the facts charged ex officio to the extent that: (a) around the front parking lot of the factory building located in Gwangju-si, the lessee is obliged to repair the interior of the building; (b) the lessee is going back from the front parking lot of the factory building; (c) however, (d) from around that time to around 10:50 of the same day, the Defendant failed to comply with the foregoing; and (d) from around that time, up to 10:50 of the same day, the Defendant’s entry of vehicles carrying materials into the factory building and the entrance of the office door entering the factory building does not disadvantage the Defendant’

In other words, it was prohibited from entering into an infant.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the demand for eviction from a building managed by the damaged person, and interfered with the operation of the victim's factory by force.

B. In a case where there are about 10 persons, such as plant-related persons and clan officers, etc., the injured and the Defendant was able to get off the Defendant’s knife of the office entrance, as above, on the ground that the injured and the Defendant attempted to get off the knife of the Defendant’s knife the knife of the Defendant’s knife of the Defendant’s knife of the knife and knife of the Defendant’s knife.