logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.06 2016고단1777
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 200,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the source of the water source method on May 1, 201, and on January 13, 2016 at the same court, a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 as a fine for the same crime.

On February 26, 2016, at around 01:47, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a f bargaining car in the section of about 1 km from the Hanwon Park Park Park Park Park to the blind distance in front of the official seal broker in the same Gu, in a state of under the influence of alcohol content of 0.089% of alcohol during blood without a driver’s license.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: (a) was a person engaging in driving of the said FF-learning car; (b) was driving the said car at the time of the same day on the same day, and led to the injury of the victim of H-si, who was under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.089% of alcohol level in the blood alcohol level at the intersection without a driver’s license, and did not give a proper flow in the passage of the vehicle at the intersection in the direction of the K-si in the direction of the sports ground, and caused the victim of H-si (46 years old) who was driving on the right side from the left side of the Defendant’s driving in the direction of the K-si, and caused the victim to suffer the injury, such as salt, tension, etc., of the trend that requires approximately two weeks of treatment for the front day of the Defendant vehicle.

3. On the same day as Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (1) at the same place as Paragraph (1) at around 02:17, the Defendant also stated that the Defendant would cause a traffic accident under Paragraph (2) in the event that the Defendant had been exposed twice due to drinking alcohol and would be subject to severe punishment. On the other hand, the Defendant stated that the police officer I, etc. who investigated the circumstances of the accident at the site of the above traffic accident was not the driver who caused the accident, but the driver who caused the accident as his relative, and thereafter up to 04:07 on the same day.

arrow