1. Of the 30,244 square meters of I forest land in Ansan-si, item (a) on board, which connects each point of the annexed drawings No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 56, 57, and 1 in sequence.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the plaintiff 127/30,244 shares in Ansan-si I forest 30,244 square meters (hereinafter "the land of this case"), defendant B and D 6,128/30,30,244 shares, each of which is 8,745/30,244 shares, defendant Eul-23/30,244 shares, defendant Eul-230,30,244 shares, 99/30,244 shares, 8,9444/30,244 shares, and defendant H owned 50/30,244 shares, and there is no agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants on the division of each land of this case. Thus, the plaintiff, a co-owner of each of the land of this case, can file a claim against the defendants for the division of each land of this case pursuant to Article 269 (1) of the Civil Act.

2. In full view of the description No. 7 of the method of partition as to the partition of co-owned property No. 7 and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the commission of appraisal to the Korea Land Information Corporation, Defendant H expressed his opinion on the ground of the instant land that there was a building owned by the Plaintiff, and on the Plaintiff’s claim for partition in kind, such as the written order, as to the Plaintiff’s claim for partition in kind, and the other Defendants did not express any opinion. As such, it is reasonable

3. In conclusion, it is reasonable to divide the land of this case by the spot-sale method as above. It is so decided as per Disposition.