1. The Defendants are 12% per annum from July 6, 2005 to April 30, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. According to the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the claim No. 5, the defendants issued and delivered a letter of undertaking to the plaintiffs on July 6, 2005, stating that "the principal shall be repaid until November 18, 2005 when borrowing KRW 150 million from the plaintiffs, and interest shall be paid KRW 18,500,000 per month (hereinafter referred to as the "certificate of this case") shall be paid at the rate of 180,000 per month, and the defendants shall be paid at the rate of 150,000,000 won from July 6, 2005, which is the date the letter of undertaking of this case, until April 30, 2015, the defendants shall pay the plaintiffs interest rate of KRW 150,000 and interest rate of KRW 150,000 per annum from the day after the date of execution of their obligation of this case to the date of completion of each contract.

(1) The plaintiffs filed a claim for the payment of damages for delay from November 18, 2004. However, as seen below, the plaintiffs prepared the instant promise with the defendants on July 6, 2005, to arrange the existing monetary relationship between them and to conclude a new monetary loan agreement between them, and to conclude a settlement agreement between them. As such, the plaintiff's assertion on the defendant's assertion on July 2, 2005

A. The defendant's assertion that the defendant asserted that the above KRW 150 million was only the money that the cellex Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "cellex Korea") would have invested from the plaintiff, and thus, the above money cannot be claimed against the defendant for the return of the said money, and the actual amount should also be KRW 139 million, and the cellex Korea returned about KRW 80 million to the plaintiff for about seven months from November 18, 2004.

B. The court may deny the content of the statement where the authenticity of the disposition document is recognized.