1. To modify the first instance judgment. A.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 3,142,54 and to the plaintiff from April 13, 2019 to June 2020.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to C Buss (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”). The Defendant is a holder of Dsi Vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles”). The Defendant is a corporation that engages in the passenger vehicle transport business of taxi passengers as the owner of Dsi Vehicles.

B. On October 29, 2018, around 08:27, the Defendant’s vehicle driven at the 414-lane red ginseng crossing in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, in the direction of the right straight intersection, three lanes, among the four-lanes in the immediately preceding two-lanes in the direction of the red intersection in the direction of the two-lanes in the direction of the right straight intersection, and entered the two-lanes in the intersection beyond the real line prior to the intersection and the stop line, and the two-lanes in the intersection. In this case, the two-lanes in the front side of the driver’s seat of the Defendant vehicle led to the one-lane.

(c).

At the time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was driven along a bus exclusive lane in the same direction. However, as the Defendant’s vehicle enters the same direction with the rhythm in the intersection, the Plaintiff’s vehicle driver is thought to have entered the same lane, and the Defendant’s vehicle attempted to turn to the left, and operated the Plaintiff’s vehicle rapidly while attempting to turn to the left, and the passenger of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was injured while exceeding the F.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

Thus, until April 12, 2019, the Plaintiff paid the F a total of KRW 3,928,180 (i.e., medical treatment expenses of KRW 2,228,180, and other damages of KRW 300,000, such as damages of KRW 216,190,000 for extra medical treatment expenses of KRW 1,190,000 for extra medical treatment expenses of KRW 6,00).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 1 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant’s vehicle changed its lane from three lanes to one lane without making any signal, such as direction indicator, to turn to the left in violation of the straight-line signal, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle is the vehicle.