The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the recognition of and against the instant crime, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the suspended execution period despite having already been subjected to the suspension of execution due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., which are the crimes of the same kind in 2008, and committed again during the suspended execution period. In light of the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, criminal records, family environment, motive, background, means, methods, and outcome of the instant crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment (the crime of expulsion 1: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and 2 years: imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months, and 2 years of suspended execution)

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.