The judgment below

Of those, the conviction against Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendants’ act in misapprehension of the legal principle constitutes a separate crime due to the business of arranging juvenile sex trafficking as well as the business of providing places of juvenile sex trafficking.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted because it cannot be viewed as constituting a separate crime due to the business of providing a place of juvenile sexual traffic, is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles on the judgment of guilty.

【The sentencing of the lower court on the grounds that the sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the four years of imprisonment for Defendant A, and the three years and six months of imprisonment for Defendant B) is unreasonable.

B. The sentencing of Defendant A is too unreasonable.

다. 피고인 B ⑴ 사실오인 내지 법리오해 ㈎ 피고인 B는 2003. 6. 1. 피고인 A이 청소년인 G을 성매매에 이용한다는 사실을 알고, G을 돌려 보낼 것을 요구하였으나 피고인 A이 이에 불응하므로 피고인 A과의 동업관계에서 이탈하였고, 그 이후 피고인 A이 단독으로 성매매 알선업을 영위한 것이지, 피고인 B와 공모한 사실이 없다.

㈏ 피고인 A이 행한 2013. 6. 1. 이후 범행에 대하여 피고인 B의 관여 사실이 다소 인정된다고 하더라도 이는 방조의 고의를 가진 방조범에 불과하다.

【The sentencing of the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the prosecutor’s assertion of the misapprehension of the legal principle, the court below determined that the Defendants’ act constitutes a crime arising from the business of arranging sexual traffic as stated in the judgment of the court below, and did not constitute a separate crime arising from the business of providing places of sexual traffic as stated in the facts charged

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in comparison with the record, we affirm the fact-finding and judgment of the court below as legitimate.

B. As to the Defendant B’s assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, the lower court’s judgment based on the overall circumstances as stated in its reasoning.