The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant did not act as a police officer’s f’s chest with the f’s chest, and did not take a bath against the police officer.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In the lower judgment, the Defendant argued that the Defendant acted as a police officer F’s chest part of the police officer F of the Crossing E District of the Crossing Police Station 2 times, and was aware of the fact that he and the police officer expressed a desire to do so. However, the Defendant argued that he and the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts. However, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the part of the police officer.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, in particular, G's testimony that the court below recognized credibility, the defendant acted as if he saw F's breast part over two times, and took a bath against police officers.

The defendant's assertion of mistake is not accepted.

B. There is no significant change in circumstances that may be considered favorable to the sentencing of the defendant after the judgment of the court below regarding the unfair argument.

Examining the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records and changes of the instant case, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair on account of all the circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal.

We do not accept the defendant's unfair argument of sentencing.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.