The judgment of the first instance is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (legal scenario) was collected by the Defendant by acquiring financial claims from a registered credit service provider by transfer and applying for a payment order. This is included in the scope of credit business permitted under Article 2 subparagraph 1 (a) of the amended Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users (hereinafter “Credit Business Act”). Thus, the Defendant’s act of this case cannot be punished under Article 112 subparagraph 1 of the Attorney-at-Law Act, and the judgment of the court of first instance which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in this case is a registered credit service provider that operates a lending company with the trade name of “F limited liability company” from the Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City E and 6.

The Defendant acquired a large amount of non-performing loans, the collection of which is unclear among the Sis, from the time to time, and against debtors, when an electronic payment order becomes final and conclusive through an application for electronic payment order, then purchased 10,618 credit card bills (total amount of bonds KRW 48,135,284,809) from the Kanyang Mutual Savings Bank on July 29, 201 for the total amount of KRW 1,000,000 (2.07% compared to the amount of bonds) and KRW 1,516 items (total amount of bonds, KRW 22,307, 277, 09 won) including credit loan claims and automobile security loan claims, and purchased 1,6184, 19, 289, 219, 207, 201, 201, 305, 201, 201, 305, 201, 201, 201, 13G.5.27.