The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

1. Around October 13, 2012, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around October 13, 2012, the Defendant sought to enter into a lease agreement with H (hereinafter “instant building”) located in G (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by the Defendant through F, which is the cause of assistance to the E Authorized Office located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) the victim I and J (“the instant building has a right to collateral security worth KRW 650 million with the maximum amount of the claim; (c) the monthly and monthly rent deposit is KRW 30 million; and (d) the victims should have confirmed that each of the instant building was the object of assistance to the Plaintiff’s lease agreement with the E Authorized Office as KRW 60,000,000,000,000 and the explanation of each of the instant building and the explanation of each of the instant building to the effect that each of the instant building was the object of assistance to the 501,000,000,000 won.

However, in fact, the monthly rent deposit prior to the instant building was much higher than KRW 350 million, and the amount of KRW 650 million was set at the maximum amount of KRW 650 million with respect to the instant building, and the interest on the instant loan was incurred more than KRW 3 million per month, and the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to return it even if he received the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lease from the victims.

Nevertheless, the defendant, by deceiving victims and deceiving them, is the same as KRW 1 million on October 14, 2012, respectively.