A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) from around 01:40 on June 16, 2018 to around 01:50, the Defendant: (b) drunkd the victim D (n) in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the first floor; (c) took a bath in “E restaurant” in the operation of the victim D (n, 46 years of age); (d) took a disturbance; and (e) took a large sense for customers on the side tables; and (e) made the customers feel uneasible.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties is a police officer of F police box, who was called out after receiving a report at the time and place specified in paragraph 1 at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and was called out by 112, G, who was a police officer of F police box of Dongjak-gu Seoul.

As “,” the phrase “,” was a dangerous object on a suspect’s table, and threatened the said G with “I am impule with flue with flue, a police officer flue with flue with flue with flue with flue, a police officer flue with flue with flue with flue with flue with flue with flue with brue as

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting processing and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of statutes on records of seizure and lists of seizure;

1. Articles 144(1), 136(1), and 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of punishment under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Duties is as follows: The scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple crimes for which there are no basic area (fence of duties) for the crimes (fence of performance of duties) (fence of performance of duties) (fence of June to January) (fence of special sentencing) (f interference of duties) (f obstruction of duties) (fence of Type 1 (f interference of duties) and (f) (fence of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Duties: (c) from June to February, and three (f) (fence of execution of duties): A sentence unfavorable to a person who is committed.