logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.06.23 2015고단249
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 8 months, and Defendant C’s imprisonment of 10 months and fine of 5,00,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint criminal conduct are persons operating five marina rooms in the name of “E” from around June 1, 2014 to the fourth floor of the Do government D Building, and five shower facilities and five mail-orders equipped with simple beds. Defendant B, from around June 14, 2014 to around June 14, 2014, provided that 50% of the profits of the said establishment is distributed among the profits of the said establishment instead of giving up KRW 30 million to Defendant A.

At around 19:40 on December 19, 2014, the Defendants conspired with each other to receive KRW 120,000 from customers and arrange female employees to communicate with customers, as well as Defendant A, from June 1, 2014, Defendant B, from around June 14, 2014, from around June 14, 2014, and from December 19, 2014 to around December 19, 2014, arranged sexual traffic in the same manner.

Accordingly, Defendant A, solely from June 1, 2014 to June 13, 2014, conspired with the Defendants from June 14, 2014 to December 19, 2014, and each business of arranging sexual traffic.

2. No person who is not a defendant A credit card merchant shall make a transaction by credit cards, etc. in the name of a credit card merchant;

The Defendant had been willing to engage in credit card transactions in the name of another credit card merchant even if the credit card merchant is not a credit card merchant.

On June 2, 2014, the Defendant settled KRW 130,000,00 of the sexual traffic price of customers who found the said sexual traffic business by using a credit card settlement terminal in the name of the credit card merchant of “F” on the fifth floor of the said building.

From around that time to June 13, 2014, the Defendant settled the sexual traffic price using a credit card settlement terminal in the name of F in the name of the Defendant’s sexual traffic business establishment, as shown in the attached list of crimes, by the same method over a total of 16 times.

The defendant is not a credit card merchant even though he is not a credit card merchant.

arrow