logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.11 2015가단144997
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 1, 202, the Plaintiff was dismissed on the ground that the Defendant was appointed as a professor B and a full-time lecturer and was employed on April 1, 2008. On January 24, 2011, the Defendant was subject to removal from office (hereinafter “the first removal from office”) due to the same disciplinary cause as the first removal from office on February 28, 201. (B) On March 15, 201, the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the said removal from office with the Appeal Commission on March 15, 201, and the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the said removal from office on June 13, 201; (3) on the ground that the lower court’s dismissal from office was not recognized as grounds for disciplinary action, and (4), (5) and (6) were not deemed as grounds for disciplinary action, and the lower court rejected the Plaintiff’s appeal against the said removal from office on the ground that the second removal from office did not constitute grounds for disciplinary action on the second removal from office.

F. The plaintiff is suspended from office.

arrow