logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.07.17 2019나38325
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the Plaintiff’s addition of the following judgments as to the matters alleged in the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff’s additional determination is that C (hereinafter “the deceased”) should be deemed to have died on the ground of the instant accident, on the ground that there was no medical treatment for the brue crymal flady, even though the brue fladal flady aggravated due to the occurrence of the traffic accident.

After the instant accident, on January 4, 2017, G Hospital 201.1. 1. 1. 200, the G Hospital’s medical records indicate that “the 2nd Ethical typhalopic typhal typhal typhal typhoidosis 2” is indicated as “Sephss and unit-based typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal 2,” and that “the 2nd 1st typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal 2, 2017, 1st 3th typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhal typhical typhal typhal typhal typhal 2,2017.

arrow