logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2021.02.10 2020고단3107
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On August 11, 2020, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 7 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the support for the development of the Suwon Friwon method.

[Criminal facts]

1. On August 26, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a C QM6 vehicle without a driver’s license on the section of approximately 20 km from the road in front of the 529 Konwon Station located in the 529 Kondong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, which was located in the city of Gyeonggi-gu to the road in front of the 20km-gu, Honam-si.

2. On August 26, 2020, the Defendant: (a) while driving a C QM6 vehicle while drinking alcohol on the front side of the Y-gu Ma-gu Ma-gu Ma-gu Ma-dong Ma-gu Ma-dong on August 26, 2020; (b) the Defendant was driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol after receiving a report on the 112 vehicle suspected of driving alcohol; (c) the Defendant was driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol from the head of the Gyeonggi-nam Police Station affiliated with the Gyeonggi-Nam-gu Ma-nam Police Station for the Change of Fa-gu Ma-dong Ma

Due to reasonable grounds, there was a demand for responding to the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately 10 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument.

Nevertheless, the defendant's refusal to take a place in his/her place of parking with water and he/she should not take a measurement.

At the end, I do not explicitly respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by stating “Ar.”

In other words, a police officer did not comply with a police officer's request for measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) or 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant who has made a statement in court;

1. Investigation reports, control photographs, statement reports on the situation of the driver in charge, investigation reports (report on the situation of the driver in charge), notification on the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol, the report on the case handling 112, and the investigation report (time 16);

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Criminal records as stated in the judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (verification of the same criminal records as the suspect), and summary order;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow