logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.02.15 2017가단532350
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 18, 2017, the deceased I (Js and hereinafter “the deceased”) suffered from Alz’s dementia, sound blood heart, etc. was hospitalized in the K Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant hospital”) for medical treatment.

B. During the course of hospitalization, the Deceased was unable to sit at the end of the corridor on the second floor of the instant hospital, where the deceased was in a sick room of the species deceased, and frequently, the Deceased saw the nurse or nurse of the instant hospital as "the nurse or nurse of the instant hospital must die, she must go to the house, she should go to the house," and she saw it as difficult to get out of the corridor.

C. At around 23:00 on June 9, 2017, L, a nurse of the instant hospital, deemed that L, a nurse of the instant hospital, was seated at the end of the second floor of the instant hospital, and said L, “I will sit without the competent authorities,” and the Deceased responded that “I will sit at a motor vehicle.”

The end of the corridor above the second floor has windows above the chair, and the windows are opened below, and the street prices installed at the middle of the windows with a studle, and the distance between the street zone and the window frame is merely 20 cm.

On June 10, 2017, around 00:20 on June 10, 2017, the Deceased: (a) went up with the above chair, and went up with its windows, and suffered pelvis, pelvis, pelvis, and pel2:25 on the same day; and (b) died on the same day.

(hereinafter “the instant accident”). The cause of the death is presumed to be a low-blood showor due to the instant accident.

E. The plaintiffs are successors as lineal descendants of each deceased.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Gap evidence 12, Gap evidence 15, Eul evidence 2-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiffs’ deceased, as they were patients suffering from Alz’s dementia at the time of being hospitalized in the instant hospital, are in lack of recognition and judgment ability, so the employees of the instant hospital should be carefully carefully cautioned so as to avoid leaving the hospital or leaving their windows outside the hospital at night.

arrow