The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In light of the fact that the defendant's appellate brief (unfair sentencing) recognizes the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's fault, there is no record of criminal punishment, and is under drug treatment due to unstable disorder, the sentence of the court below that sentenced the defendant to a fine of 2 million won and a fine of 40 hours is too unreasonable.

2. The facts alleged in the grounds of appeal are as follows: (a) each of the instant offenses committed by the Defendant using a camera function located in his/her mobile phone to photograph the parts of the damaged women at least seven times; (b) the victims want to punish the Defendant; and (c) the circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal are already reflected in the lower court’s favorable sentencing factors; and (d) there are no special changes in circumstances that may be considered in the depth; and (b) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime were taken into account; and (c) the lower court’s punishment is too excessive and is not deemed unfair, and thus, the aforementioned allegation is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.