Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two and half years, by imprisonment for two years, and by imprisonment for one and half years, and by imprisonment for one and half years.
2...
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The telephone financial fraud organization of the 2016 Highest 377th century consists of a false statement by exposing a phone to an unspecified number of people in the Republic of Korea while operating a call center at an overseas, etc., and its respective roles are shared by the following: (a) the organization plans to acquire money by means of causing people to keep the money in custody or receiving it directly (hereinafter referred to as “scaming”); (b) the term “invitation” refers to the false statement by telephone; (c) the victims directly receive money from the victims; and (d) the amount of money deposited by the victims; and (e) the remittance of the damaged amount to China.
The Defendants, by misrepresenting the victims of their phone calls to investigative agencies or financial institutions, and misrepresenting them to the effect that “the victims are expected to suffer damage by leakage of personal information, and take custody of, or deliver to, the designated persons.” Defendant A and B, as “book for Withdrawal”, sent cash stored by the victims at the victim’s home, or delivered cash from the victims by misrepresenting the police officer, to “transfer liability” the remaining amount of money excluding the Defendants’ allowances. Defendant C, as “the remittance liability,” Defendant C, as “the money received from the Defendant, etc.,” conspiredd to commit a criminal act of fraud with K and under his name, “the total liability” by sharing their respective roles by remitting the money received from the Defendant, etc. to China through money exchange litigation.
1. On March 7, 2016, according to the above conspiracy to commit the crime against the victim L, an employee in charge of telephone financing fraud in name is required to withdraw all bank deposits because of the risk that the cash withdrawal card was created without permission and the money was broken off from the phone to the victim L (the age of 81) on March 7, 2016.