logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2020.02.13 2019고단1432
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 25, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in Daegu District Court racing support.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a ice car.

1. Around 02:40 on September 27, 2019, the Defendant driven the spke vehicle under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.158% of blood alcohol concentration at the 1km section from the Do preceding the Do in North-gu C at the port of port to the road preceding the North-gu E at port of port.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

2. On September 27, 2019, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) proceeded at a speed of about 20 km in speed, depending on the two-lanes in the direction of a police box of the dead-do in the direction of the plaza, the front road of North Korea at port, North Korea, at port, in the direction of the square.

At night, the above location was intersection where signal lights were installed, so the driver of the motor vehicle at this location had a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by properly operating and operating the steering system and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving the said car while under the influence of alcohol as described in Paragraph 1, brought the back part of the G-learning car driven by the victim F (the age of 62) who was stopped in accordance with the red light of the intersection from the front side of the Defendant’s negligence in the course of duty, with the front part of the said S-P car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim F and the victim H (the age of 53) who was on board the Defendant’s frighting car due to occupational negligence, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1.Each.

arrow